Death Penalty Legislation Could Change
Save Email Print
Bookmark and Share
Updated: 7:48 AM Nov 18, 2009
Death Penalty Legislation Could Change
Harrisonburg, Va.
Local legislators say there could be changes to Virginia's death penalty legislation when Bob McDonnell becomes governor.
Posted: 6:07 PM Nov 17, 2009
Reporter: Philip Townsend
Email Address: ptownsend@whsv.com
width:200 and height: 120 and picwidth: 200 and pciheight: 120
Font Size:

Local legislators say there could be changes to Virginia's death penalty legislation when Bob McDonnell becomes governor.

Since 2004, both chambers in the Virginia General Assembly have passed a reform to something that's known as Triggerman Rule. However, each time the reform was sent to the governor's desk, it was vetoed.

State Sen. Mark Obenshain says, "I fully understand that fair-minded people might disagree about the death penalty. However, this is an important reform."

Obenshain has been one of the key sponsors of the bill that would make co-conspirators of murder eligible for the death penalty, regardless of whether or not they physically committed the crime.

He adds, "It must be fair, and it must be consistent. What this loophole does is draw distinctions and differentiates in a way that makes no sense."

However, when Bob McDonnell takes over as governor, the Triggerman loophole may be removed.

It is not good news for opponents of the death penalty, like Harrisonburg resident Chris Edwards.

Edwards says, "There is no evidence that there is less serious crime in the states that don't have capital punishment."

Edwards says the change could open up the gates for even more executions in Virginia.

She says, "I'd rather see more rehabilitative programs and more police on the roads and on the streets."

Obenshain adds, "It's something that I think is important in making sure that our criminal justice system is fair, blind, and evenly and equally applied."

Currently, there are three exceptions to the Triggerman Rule in Virginia.

In order for a person, co-conspirator, to be eligible for capital murder charges and thus the death penalty, the crime would have to involve a murder-for-hire, an enterprise group such as a gang or mob, or be related to terrorism.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Chris Edwards Location: Harrisonburg on Nov 18, 2009 at 11:32 AM

In the quick interview yesterday, I unfortunately mis-spoke. No, the rates of violent crime do NOT indicate that capital punishment makes us any safer. Numerous studies show states which execute people have as much or more violent crime than those which don't.
Posted by: Frank Location: Harrisonburg on Nov 18, 2009 at 10:10 AM

Kudos for Bob McDonnell.
Posted by: GingersPop Location: Mathias on Nov 18, 2009 at 07:39 AM

Edwards says, "There is no evidence that there is less serious crime in the states that don't have capital punishment." Well I guess not. Why would states with no death penalty have less crime? If executions were carried out in a timely manner as they were 100 years ago, there would be even less crime, at least of capital offenses than we have now.
First Alert Weather
WHSV Poll
A committee in the House of Delegates has sent a bill to the House floor that would allow private, faith-based adoption agencies to discriminate against prospective parents based on their sexual orientation. Would you support this?

Yes, I think if it is a private organization it's okay.
No, there should be no discrimination.
It should depend on a case by case basis.


National NDN Video
WHSV - TV 3 on Facebook