Allowing Guns on Campus
Save Email Print
Updated: 11:08 AM Feb 16, 2008
Allowing Guns on Campus
Harrisonburg, Va.
In the wake of Thursday's shooting at NIU, the issue of allowing students and faculty to carry concealed weapons on campus is getting renewed attention.
Posted: 6:56 PM Feb 15, 2008
Reporter: Kelly Creswell
Email Address: kcreswell@whsv.com
width:200 and height: 120 and picwidth: 200 and pciheight: 120
Font Size:

In the wake of Thursday's shooting on the campus of Northern Illinois University where six people were killed including the gunman, the issue of allowing students and faculty to carry concealed weapons on campus is getting renewed attention.

For many students, the recent campus shooting brought back many memories of Virginia Tech. There were some mixed reactions about whether or not guns on the school's campus would create a safer or more dangerous environment.

Virginia has been wrestling with this issue for years.

"In hindsight, it's easy to look back and say you know, if someone had had a gun, who was licensed and knew how to carry it, they could have stopped the killer," says Kate Joyce, a JMU student.

So should students and faculty be allowed to carry a concealed weapon on campus? JMU Professor Dorn Peterson says concealed weapon holders are statistically seven times more law-abiding than the average person.

He says, "When you make a rule or a law that says you shouldn't be on campus with a concealed handgun, what you're doing is you're leaving [out] the people who actually pay attention to the law, and those are exactly the people who you don't need to worry about."

However, others believe carrying guns on campus isn't going to make these situations any safer. These people also think only a few should have the privilege.

"Limited to law enforcement or military, and that those of us who are civilians should not be carrying weapons," says John Gilje, a JMU professor.

At a time when the Virginia Tech tragedy remains a sore memory for many students in Virginia, the debate has become energized.

JMU student Michael Parsons says, "I don't want kids being heroes. I don't want them to try to solve it themselves. That's going to make the situation worse. I think that kids with concealed weapons on campus, even the best intentioned kids, just make it a more dangerous place in general. I feel like police officers should be allowed to carry it on campus with security, but not students or professors."

Even though campus shootings are rare, students at JMU say they feel safe while they're on campus, but they also point out that JMU is just as vulnerable as any other school in the nation.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Steve Location: Utah on Feb 19, 2008 at 09:50 AM

There are hundreds of thousands of people with concealed weapons licenses. If they are a danger, there would be a clear track record of violence committed by such people. However, the opposite is true. There is a clear record of these people preventing and stopping active shooters and violent criminals. If you want fewer mass public shootings, you have to allow more law abiding citizens to carry defensive weapons.
Posted by: Rusty Location: Shenandoah, VA on Feb 17, 2008 at 09:20 AM

Andrew, I couldnt agree more. The Army trusts them with a multi-million dollar tank, and the Commonwealth will issue them a permit to carry, but the college wont honor it. Getting a permit is harder than one thinks, and the students who would obtain it are the least likely to be the law breakers.
Posted by: John Location: Blacksburg, VA on Feb 17, 2008 at 01:52 AM

The number of people who are concealed-carry certified is statistically too low that there's any real chance they'd be in a classroom in which a shooting occurs--unless the CC-holder is the shooter. I don't know how that professor got the seven-times-more-law-abiding statistic. That sort of thing is very hard to measure, especially since you can't quantify someone's upstandingness. You either obey the law or not. In any case, the shooter at NIU was "law-abiding." He'd only ever had a speeding ticket. He was subjected to background checks and raised no red flags. Can't we just accept that occasionally people do irrational things? Putting guns in more people's hands will only increase the damage that can be done at those irrational moments. You can't injure sixty people (as at VT) or kill thirty-two with a baseball bat. Unless you're in the coma ward, maybe.
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.
National AP Video