Virginia AG: Supreme Court should decide if DC sniper gets re-sentenced
Virginia's attorney general said he'll ask the U.S. Supreme Court to decide if Washington, D.C., sniper Lee Boyd Malvo should get a new sentencing hearing.
Attorney General Mark Herring said in a statement Friday that Malvo's resentencing should be put on hold as he seeks the Supreme Court's review. Herring asked the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to halt a recent order that granted Malvo a new penalty hearing.
“Malvo remains a convicted mass murderer who terrorized an entire region with his heinous and cold blooded killings," said Herring. "I will keep working to ensure that he faces justice and serves the sentences that were imposed.”
Malvo was 17 when he and John Allen Muhammad fatally shot 10 people in the Washington area in 2002. Muhammad was executed. Malvo got several life terms, including four in Virginia.
The 4th Circuit ruled last week that Malvo should be resentenced in Virginia under the Supreme Court's new rules for punishing juveniles. Herring argues Malvo's sentence already complies with those rules because of Virginia's discretionary life sentence.
He also argues that the 4th Circuit decision conflicts with decisions by courts in Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Missouri, New Mexico, South Dakota and Texas, as well as the First, Fifth, and Eighth Circuits
Related StoriesAttorney: DC sniper life sentence is unconstitutional
Federal judge tosses out life sentences for DC sniper Malvo
Virginia appeals new sentencing hearings for sniper Malvo
Judge hears challenge to DC-area sniper's life sentence
Appeals court temporarily blocks new sentencing for DC sniper
D.C. sniper Malvo denied new sentence by Maryland judge
Appeals court to hear arguments on DC sniper's sentence