Attorney says 2 tree-sitters are exempt from eminent domain
An attorney says Mountain Valley Pipeline can't invoke eminent domain to remove two tree-sitters protesting on land where they have no legal ownership interest.
the argument was presented Wednesday in a court filing by attorney John Fishwick on behalf of supporters of the Virginia tree-sitters, who have avoided court. He asked Judge Elizabeth Dillon to deny Mountain Valley's request for a preliminary injunction the company says it needs to evict the tree-sitters.
Two protesters have been living in tree stands about 50 feet above the forest floor on a mountainside in eastern Montgomery County where pipeline crews need to complete tree-cutting. They've been there since early September, following the lead of
, who were ordered to leave their stands.
But, unlike the past tree-sitters, the current two have no legal ownership of the land where they're perched. The landowner did not grant them permission, but has no plans to ask them to leave either, because he opposed the pipeline taking his property.
Fishwick says Mountain Valley erred by including the tree-sitters in cases in which eminent domain allowed the removal of protesters with property interests in the land.
Mountain Valley's 300-mile (483-kilometer) natural gas pipeline is being constructed in West Virginia and Virginia. The company has seven days to respond.
Related StoriesVirginia pharmacy board member ousted over protest access
Company releases half its workforce after pipeline slowdown
Feds let work proceed on part of Mountain Valley Pipeline
Mountain Valley Pipeline protester to perform community service
2 more protesters take to trees along Mountain Valley route
Developers say Mountain Valley Pipeline to now cost $4.6B
6 arrested at Mountain Valley Pipeline site in West Virginia
Landowners ask Supreme Court to hear Mountain Valley case
Judge dismisses charges against Bent Mountain tree sitters
Man straps self to machine to protest West Virginia pipeline
AG Mark Herring and environmental dept. sue Mountain Valley Pipeline
Lawsuit: Pipeline security pursued false trespassing charges